I recently attended one of the two days that my church joined in via live-stream to the "1613 Men's Conference"
The conference was predicated on 1 Corinthians 16:13, which reads:
"Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong."
I believe the speakers' aim was to address that line, "Act like men". What does it mean? The underlying premise of the conference was that there is a scriptural standard which defines the answer to that question, and it lies in stark contrast to how the world would seek to answer it.
Good so far.
Before I continue let me say this - I was not asked to speak at this conference, so any criticism that I may have is coming from a man who was not in the arena.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood;"
I take nothing away from the men who spent their time to prepare and to present their thoughts. I am but a critic in this context.
That being said, here are my thoughts.
The audience was urged to listen to men due to their extensive resumes. Resumes that consisted of incredible successes on the battlefield, or in the sports stadium, or the courtroom. In one instance the audience was being urged to not pursue manhood based on the world's standard of success, and in the next were told a man was credible due to his worldly successes.
I did not hear one man introduced with qualifiers such as, "He has six grown children who all remained in the faith".
The heavy majority of speakers were war veterans. Automatically claiming the respect of men in the audience because what is more manly than going to war? What could be more selfless?
Does the type of selflessness that we like to talk about only consist of prioritizing national security over personal safety? What about the type that would prioritize family over personal accolades? Is the greatest sense of duty depicted by dying on a battlefield, and not by homeschooling our kids in order to raise them in the training and admonition of the Lord. I am not meaning to take anything away from men who have sacrificed, but I what I would like to draw attention to is that the military is filled with men who can make decisions under fire, and who are unable to discipline a child. When you make sacrifices on the battlefield, men respect you, medals are earned, beers are purchased. When you make sacrifices at home, you simply lay your head to rest on your pillow at night and do it again the next day. Usually there is no thanks, there is no spotlight. So which really is the sacrifice? I grew weary during my time in the Marine Corps of men all too willing to accept the common "thank you for your service" and all too willing to serve only their personal desires when it came to their family, or their duty as husband or father. To an audience full of fathers and husbands, the conference consisted, in my opinion, of too many war stories, and too few home stories.
We love to train firearms. We love to shoot, I love to shoot. We know that when tragedy visits us we do not rise to the occasion but simply fall back to our level of training. And so we train. But how many times in your life will you need to draw concealed in the grocery store and shoot an active threat? How many times in your life will a man enter your home at night seeking harm to your family? Switching gears, how many times will your children look to you for wisdom? So as we prioritize our time, what type of training will be put to the test more frequently? Make no mistake, both are of life or death consequence.
Nick Freitas made a comment I couldn't help but write in my notes. "Men say, 'I'd die for my family', yeah, probably instantly". He rightly makes a jab at those men who are quick to claim they would act heroically in a single instant, but then fail to act heroically in the opportunities that are presented to him each and every day. Decisions to train, decisions to wake early, decisions to ask forgiveness, decisions to sacrifice time doing something he would like to do in order to do something he knows he ought to do. This person thinks a lifetime of selfish decisions will prepare him to make an incredibly unselfish decision in a moment of crisis. Not so.
Joel Salatin: Food predicated on an anti-death philosophy is anti-Christian. To the Vegans and Vegetarians, all that they are doing is seeking to eliminate death as a prerequisite to life. To the chemical fertilizer industry, they seek to claim that you can have life without sacrifice, that something does not have to die for something else to live. I am always encouraged by this man's consistency.
I appreciated the time I had to listen to other Men's perspectives, hear their stories, and think critically about their claims. I think the conference as a whole missed the mark in that their aim was to point men to scripture for their definition of manhood, but urged you to listen to the speakers based on their worldy accolades. For an audience likely hungry for practical application, they were given war stories. War stories are great, they can be applied to our spiritual war surely, but the application has to be drawn and has to be clearly prescribed, otherwise you may just enlighten that flame inside every man that is so drawn to the foreign battlefield which yeilds glory and drawn away from that battlefield in their own homes. In simple terms, its sexy to fight your way to a downed blackhawk, its boring to lead family worship. Unless of course you rightly state that the two are not all that different and that one is in fact much harder and much more important than the other - that is the piece that I found missing during the conference. A disconnect.
Verse 14: Let all that you do be done in love.